Nollywood actress Liz Anjorin has criticised veteran actress Iyabo Ojo after the latter shared a Lagos State High Court order restricting her from publishing or distributing photographs of Priscilla Ojo’s one-year-old son, Rakeem Mkambala.
Anjorin made her position known during an Instagram Live session on Friday, where she questioned why the court document was made public before, according to her, it had been formally served on the respondent.
She also challenged the validity of the document and described the legal action as unlikely to succeed.
The dispute follows an interim order issued by Justice Yetunde Adesanya of the Lagos State High Court on September 2, 2026.
The order was granted in a suit filed by Priscilla, her husband, Juma Mussa Mkambala, and their son. It prevents Anjorin, either personally or through people acting on her behalf, from posting, sharing, uploading or broadcasting photographs of the child on social media.
Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and TikTok were among the platforms specifically mentioned in the directive.
The court further barred Anjorin from publishing or circulating editorials concerning Priscilla, her husband and their child on the listed platforms until the substantive application before the court is determined.
During her online broadcast, Anjorin also dismissed claims connected to the legal dispute involving Priscilla and questioned the decision to circulate legal documents on social media.
The court order identified several social media accounts allegedly associated with Anjorin, including @lizzyanjorin_originallawal, @lizzyanjorin_original, @lizzyanjorin_legal_mrslawal and @yeyemesho_luxuryfabric1. A Facebook account identified as Lizzyanjorin2 was also listed.
The development represents a new phase in the prolonged disagreement between Anjorin and Iyabo Ojo, which has largely played out across social media.
Anjorin has previously made several posts concerning the Ojo family, while the latest court action has now placed restrictions on her ability to publish material involving Priscilla’s son and members of the family.
The legal proceedings are ongoing, with the interim order remaining in effect pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application.
